This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

“Regulations—meant to bolster housing security, community vitality, and infrastructure—appear to be understudied factors that paradoxically reinforce problems."

- Meredith Greif, professor of urban sociology at Johns Hopkins1

Should you invest in apartment markets with increasing or already-high tenant protections? The quote above highlights the core questions in today’s issue - the actual impact of so-called “tenant protection” policies as viewed from a dispassionate investment perspective. You are likely to be surprised.

The instinctive response to investing in regulated markets is an emphatic “no,” thinking that with tenant protections comes an erosion of upside including limits on renewal-rent increases, less ability to evict non-paying residents and lots of administrative burden. Maybe true, but let your best investing self hear this: Strong tenant-protection laws drive rents higher and vacancies lower, according to new research.2

logo

The rest of this analysis is for paid subscribers.

Join a community of fund managers, principals, and lenders who use this work in IC memos and credit decisions. Full analysis, the complete archive, and zero sell-side noise. $10 a month. No annual commitment required.

Upgrade to Premium Today - 30 Days FREE!

A subscription gets you:

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading